1 minute read

Cyber Threats Turn to Second-Degree Murder

Last Updated: March 1, 2023

Luke Gilkerson
Luke Gilkerson

Luke Gilkerson has a BA in Philosophy and Religious Studies and an MA in Religion. He is the author of Your Brain on Porn and The Talk: 7 Lessons to Introduce Your Child to Biblical Sexuality. Luke and his wife Trisha blog at IntoxicatedOnLife.com

In April 2009, what started as a series of vicious phone calls, text messages, and Myspace messages turned physical when Rachel Wade stabbed and killed Sarah Ludemann. These two teens had been fighting over a boy, Joshua Camacho.

While Rachel was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 27 years, she hopes her story can serve as a warning to teens everywhere.

Anonymity is part of the problem

While the horrendous violence in the Rachel/Ludemann case is unique, their war of words exchanged over the Internet is not. Cyberbullying and cyber threats happen all the time.

You can hide behind technology,” Wade says, “You can be a whole other person.” What Wade is referring to is a well known phenomenon known as the online disinhibition effect. Dr. John Suler, a psychologist from Rider University, explains:

Everyday users of the Internet have noted how people say and do things in cyberspace that they wouldn’t ordinarily say and do in the face-to-face world. They loosen up, feel less restrained, and express themselves more openly.

We see this disinhibition effect play out all the time online, from the amount of time we spend online to the things we look at on our computer screens, from the people we speak with to the words we use.

Internet use is largely an anonymous activity. No one has to know where we go or what we do on the Internet. Additionally, when we interact with one another online, we often lose the benefit of looking others in the face and seeing how our actions impact them.

Accountability is part of the solution

For ourselves and our children, one of the best ways to reverse this trend is by providing an atmosphere of accountability around Internet use. When you are voluntarily accountable to others about how you use the Internet, it makes you more aware that what you do online matters. You are less likely to do or say things that are against your personal values.

  • Comments on: Cyber Threats Turn to Second-Degree Murder
    1. Kristin

      Everything here is so true. I teach middle school students and just last weekend I was talking to one of my honors students and she was recalling how she and her friends bullied another girl so much that the girl moved all the way across the country to get away. I asked this girl if she felt bad and she said she does now, but didn’t at the time. Also, she didn’t call it “bullying,” but I feel like it was. Our school even has a Bully Free policy but this was something happening more through texting than face-to-face bullying.

      • Luke Gilkerson

        @Kristin – It’s true. Bullying is so much easier through electronic communication because there’s no accountability. People feel free to say or do what they wouldn’t do face-to-face.

    2. Tam

      Am I the only one who sees this as a copout. The girl murders someone over a boy and blames the Internet?

      • Luke Gilkerson

        @Tam – Rachel is not blaming the Internet for her actions, but is saying how the technology allowed the worst in her to come out. At least that’s how this interview portrays it.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *