Help Others Restore Integrity
Help Others Restore Integrity 4 minute read

The Debate Over Net Neutrality Continues

Last Updated: April 10, 2015

 

The issue of “net neutrality” has been hotly debated for years. On December 21, the FCC issued a new order, hoping to preserve an “open network” for consumers and investors, but not everyone is convinced their new rules solve any of the problems around net neutrality.

What is Net Neutrality? Internet access is largely provided through network pipelines owned by cable and phone companies. Some of these ISPs (Internet Service Providers) would like to charge premium fees for major users of the World Wide Web (companies like Google or Microsoft). Organizations that pay these fees would be ensured speedy broadband access—what some have called an Internet “fast lane.” For instance, Comcast Corporation could offer to speed up Hulu—if Hulu wanted to pay a price.

If ISPs go this route, many fear other services that use the Web could be relegated to an Internet “slow lane” or eventually banned altogether. Advocates for net neutrality ask for a level playing field: you should not be charged extra to put your Internet application or website into the pipelines. Advocates not only believe this encourages economic growth and ingenuity, but many believe “neutrality” is a founding principle of the Internet itself.

An Old Debate

The hinge of the disagreement is not whether the Internet should remain as “open” as possible—that is desirable to many parties. Rather, the debate is over what way the government should get involved.

Tim Wu, professor at Columbia Law School, is often credited with coining the term “network neutrality.” He believes it is important to differentiate sharply between the principle of network neutrality and a network neutrality law. They are not the same. “In an ideal world,” Wu writes, “either competition or enlightened self-interest might drive carriers to design neutral networks.” But we do not live in an ideal world.

Nearly five years ago The Center for American Progress brought together two “fathers” of the Internet to debate the issue of net neutrality: Vinton Cerf (VP of Google and former chairman of ICANN) and Dave Farber (Distinguished Career Professor of Computer Science and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University). Both distinguished speakers agreed the government should protect consumers’ rights, but disagreed about what should be done.

Cerf said DSL providers, for instance, are having difficulty expanding because the cost is so great, so they are asking application service providers to pay for access to the broadband networks, in addition to the individual Internet users. “Some of us are worried that what that will do is inhibit innovation in the networks,” Cerf stated. “Suppose you have a new idea, you want to try it out, but it happens to require some broadband access […] Unless you also pay for access to the broadband facility to deliver your application, you won’t get access to it. Your application may never get off the ground.” Cerf would like to see the ISPs continue to be merely neutral facilitators between providers and consumers, and to ensure that will happen Cerf believes we need good legislation.

Farber agreed with much of Cerf’s ideas but thought getting Congress involved was a mistake. He believed if we try to weld our solutions into law we would be “prejudging” the path that technology takes, creating more problems for the evolution of the Internet. Farber stated, “To have the Congress pass hazy laws and then expect these regulatory mechanisms [like the FCC] to rapidly be responsive to new technologies and new ways of doing things is probably expecting too much.” He agrees there are dangers to ISPs having a monopoly but thinks there are effective mechanisms in place already to solve potential problems, citing, for example, antitrust laws. If ISPs use their networks to set up unfair systems that inhibit competition or encourage monopolies, there are already regulations in place, enforced by the Department of Justice, to handle these concerns.

A New Debate

Popular discussion about net neutrality tends to revolve around First Amendment issues—could ISPs hinder free expression on the Internet? Professor Farber says this only obscures the main point:

The whole discussion of net neutrality has turned into a show. Everything and the kitchen sink has been brought to bear under the net neutrality banner, including freedom of speech, etc. I think it’s obscured the fundamental question that should be addressed, and that’s the future of our communication system.

Jon Crowcroft, Professor of Communications Systems at the University of Cambridge, says the issue is somewhat unique to the United States. “In general,” Crowcroft states, “I would point out that the US has been the source of all the worry about neutrality.” In the UK, Crowcroft says, there is no need for increased regulation because there is a healthy competition among ISPs: there is increasing performance and coverage of broadband access, 3G and 4G access, with falling prices.

Last month the FCC passed three rules that weigh in on net neutrality.

  1. To comply with the FCC, ISPs must be transparent about how well their networks work and their pricing plans so consumers can “make informed choices.”
  2. ISPs also cannot completely block any lawful Internet applications or services.
  3. Finally, ISPs cannot “unreasonably discriminate” in transmitting Internet traffic unless it does for the sake of “reasonable network management.” Giving third parties “pay for priority” would likely fall into the “unreasonable” category.

Tim Wu explains that the rules are as good as a ban on any would-be Internet fast lane. The cable industry, for instance, would need to create a complex system in order to comply with the FCC guidelines. Wu says, “That’s particularly unhappy news for the cable industry, which has more of a fast lane to sell.”

If upheld, these rules could mean good news for individual consumers. If cable companies are bound to give all Internet applications equal share of high speed pipelines, this means consumers will not need to worry about their ISP slowing down Netflix or Hulu.

There is a fair amount of uncertainty around these new rules. First and foremost, federal courts have stopped the FCC in the past from exercising authority over net neutrality issues. Only time will tell if the same happens again in this case. FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, who voted against this policy, says, “The FCC is not only defying a court, but it is circumventing the will of a large bipartisan majority of Congress as well […] As a result, the FCC has provocatively charted a collision course with the legislative branch.”

Comments on: The Debate Over Net Neutrality Continues

Related in Help Others Restore Integrity

Editor's Picks

The front of a historic Catholic church against a blue sky.

Help Others Restore Integrity

5 Steps to Implement Safe Haven Sunday in Your Parish

Regardless of the size of a parish, the role of the parish…

6 minute read

Read Post

Editor's Picks

A woman sharing about church resources with a group.

Help Others Restore Integrity

5 Resources Your Parish Needs to Be Sharing to Equip Marriages and Families

Addressing pornography in your parish can be a full-time job, and maybe…

6 minute read

Read Post

Editor's Picks

A priest giving a homily at his church.

Help Others Restore Integrity

Revitalizing Diocesan and Parish Ministry With Safe Haven Sunday

Addressing hard topics is key to fruitful diocesan and parish ministry. After…

7 minute read

Read Post

Editor's Picks

Two male accountability partners encouraging one another.

Help Others Restore Integrity

3 Keys To Making Accountability Work

Covenant Eyes serves many churches, missionary organizations, and other groups, and using…

7 minute read

Read Post

Editor's Picks

A pastor preparing for a sermon with a Bible and study tools.

Help Others Restore Integrity

Plan for Success in the Battle Against Pornography!

At Covenant Eyes, we talk with pastors every week as they come…

2 minute read

Read Post

Editor's Picks

Black and white image of a worship service in a church.

Help Others Restore Integrity

3 Ways Your Church Might be Paying “The Porn Tax”

Have you been to a struggling church before? You know—a group of…

3 minute read

Read Post

Related in Help Others Restore Integrity

The front of a historic Catholic church against a blue sky.

Help Others Restore Integrity

5 Steps to Implement Safe Haven Sunday in Your Parish

Regardless of the size of a parish, the role of the parish…

Regardless of the size of a parish, the role of the parish priest and his leadership team is essentially the same: the salvation of souls. This is the sole reason for the Incarnation, Passion, Death,…

6 minute read

0 comments

A woman sharing about church resources with a group.

Help Others Restore Integrity

5 Resources Your Parish Needs to Be Sharing to Equip Marriages and Families

Addressing pornography in your parish can be a full-time job, and maybe…

Addressing pornography in your parish can be a full-time job, and maybe you have a coordinator who does in fact have it as his or her job description. Whether or not that role exists in…

6 minute read

0 comments

A priest giving a homily at his church.

Help Others Restore Integrity

Revitalizing Diocesan and Parish Ministry With Safe Haven Sunday

Addressing hard topics is key to fruitful diocesan and parish ministry. After…

Addressing hard topics is key to fruitful diocesan and parish ministry. After the Gospel reading, I sat down in my pew and asked the Holy Spirit to open me up to what the priest was…

7 minute read

0 comments

Two male accountability partners encouraging one another.

Help Others Restore Integrity

3 Keys To Making Accountability Work

Covenant Eyes serves many churches, missionary organizations, and other groups, and using…

Covenant Eyes serves many churches, missionary organizations, and other groups, and using accountability software on all devices can be very beneficial—but only when individuals are encouraged to have safe and personal friends or mentors receive…

7 minute read

0 comments

A pastor preparing for a sermon with a Bible and study tools.

Help Others Restore Integrity

Plan for Success in the Battle Against Pornography!

At Covenant Eyes, we talk with pastors every week as they come…

At Covenant Eyes, we talk with pastors every week as they come to us looking for resources, solutions, or just plain, “what can I do next” questions.  Most are reacting to a current cry for…

2 minute read

0 comments

Black and white image of a worship service in a church.

Help Others Restore Integrity

3 Ways Your Church Might be Paying “The Porn Tax”

Have you been to a struggling church before? You know—a group of…

Have you been to a struggling church before? You know—a group of people who show up more or less every Sunday morning, but it’s like pulling teeth to get anyone committed beyond that? Or maybe…

3 minute read

2 comments