<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Pornography at Public Libraries – When the debate hits home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Pornography Addiction, Removing Online Temptation, and the Need for Accountability.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:09:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Peter Simonetti</title>
		<link>http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/comment-page-1/#comment-68064</link>
		<dc:creator>William Peter Simonetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/?p=6786#comment-68064</guid>
		<description>I find the complete &quot;pornography issue  a &quot;bit much&quot;;where as; If the National Library commands that any Library receiving &quot;Federal Tax Dollars must have access to Porn yet &#039;Albed to empower &quot;&quot;DO NOT USE!&quot; Where is the sense to this logic?What is &quot;rule of thumb?Please someone explain to me the rules of vieweing porn sites in United States Libraries  Before Ipush the &quot;submit comment&quot; tabI am personally &quot;red-faced&quot; having to go to such lengths to learn the truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the complete &#8220;pornography issue  a &#8220;bit much&#8221;;where as; If the National Library commands that any Library receiving &#8220;Federal Tax Dollars must have access to Porn yet &#8216;Albed to empower &#8220;&#8221;DO NOT USE!&#8221; Where is the sense to this logic?What is &#8220;rule of thumb?Please someone explain to me the rules of vieweing porn sites in United States Libraries  Before Ipush the &#8220;submit comment&#8221; tabI am personally &#8220;red-faced&#8221; having to go to such lengths to learn the truth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Gilkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/comment-page-1/#comment-51808</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Gilkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/?p=6786#comment-51808</guid>
		<description>@John - Of course no pictures of naked women are &quot;obscenity.&quot; Only the public display of them is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John &#8211; Of course no pictures of naked women are &#8220;obscenity.&#8221; Only the public display of them is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/comment-page-1/#comment-51806</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/?p=6786#comment-51806</guid>
		<description>Pictures of naked women are not &quot;obsecenity&quot;. Whether you believe it is or not, no US court will agree with you. Just because you are an abuser of porn doesn&#039;t mean that the rest of us have to suffer because of your addiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pictures of naked women are not &#8220;obsecenity&#8221;. Whether you believe it is or not, no US court will agree with you. Just because you are an abuser of porn doesn&#8217;t mean that the rest of us have to suffer because of your addiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/2009/09/17/internet-pornography-at-public-libraries-%e2%80%93-when-the-debate-hits-home/comment-page-1/#comment-51661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.covenanteyes.com/blog/?p=6786#comment-51661</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your good research for your own state and community.  It inspires me to investigate my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your good research for your own state and community.  It inspires me to investigate my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
